CyberMindr recognized in Gartner®’s latest Threat Exposure Management Report

Why Evidence-Based Cybersecurity Is the Only Way to Fix Risks at Group Scale

malware Image

Cybermindr Insights

Published on: January 28, 2026

Last Updated: February 5, 2026

Organizations managing multiple subsidiaries often have strong security standards, capable teams, and defined processes. Even then, getting risks fixed consistently across business units can take longer than expected.

Security work competes with business priorities every day. When a group security team flags an issue, local owners still need one clear proof that the risk is real, reachable, and urgent.

This is why a simple request like “Please fix this” rarely drives consistent outcomes at group scale. What works better is a validation-driven approach that helps teams focus on the issues attackers can actually exploit. 

Cybersecurity at Group Scale Needs Proof, Not More Tickets 

Across subsidiaries, security teams often see the same types of exposure repeat:

- Internet-facing applications that were never meant to be public
- Remote access systems and edge services exposed to the internet
- Weak authentication on portals and admin panels
- Leaked credentials tied to business accounts
- Misconfigured cloud services
- Abandoned domains and unused subdomains

These risks are well understood. The challenge is making them a priority across multiple teams that operate with different delivery timelines, uptime requirements, and resource constraints.

At group scale, remediation needs a consistent way to show which issues matter most right now. 

The CISO’s Role Is Now About Measurable Resilience 

In 2026, security leadership will be judged less by the number of controls in place and more by outcomes. Executives and boards want clear answers to questions like:

- Are external risks reducing over time?
- Are we closing the issues attackers use most often?
- Which subsidiaries are most exposed today?
- How quickly are we eliminating real entry points?

Security programs also operate in increasingly complex tool environments. Research from Panaseer, based on 1,200 security decision-makers, reports that organizations use an average of 76 security tools.

Tool coverage may improve visibility in specific areas, but it can also increase reporting volume without improving clarity on what should be fixed first across subsidiaries.

Why Fixing Issues Across Subsidiaries Is Hard 

Too many vulnerabilities and not enough time
Most large groups of companies have more issues than they can remediate quickly. Vulnerability reports grow faster than remediation capacity, especially when each subsidiary has different environments, owners, and change control processes. Without filtering, remediation becomes backlog management rather than measurable exposure reduction.

Attackers move fast
External risks change rapidly. New weaknesses become widely known soon after disclosure, and automation has increased attacker speed. Industry reporting shows AI systems can generate functional exploit code for new vulnerabilities in as little as 10–15 minutes.
This does not mean every vulnerability will be exploited immediately. It does mean the time available to act on truly exposed risks is shrinking.

“High severity” does not tell teams what to fix first
Many organizations classify large volumes of findings as high or critical. Over time, severity becomes less useful as a prioritization signal because it does not answer questions remediation owners need:

- Can this weakness be reached from the internet?
- Is it connected to a clear attack path?
- Could it lead to disruption, data exposure, or fraud?
- Is this a current risk or a theoretical one?
When these answers are missing, fixes are delayed and escalations become less effective.

Business units need operational certainty
Subsidiaries manage uptime, production, customer commitments, and regulatory obligations. Changes are planned carefully. Fix requests are evaluated based on risk, effort, and operational impact.

When the exposure is validated and linked to impact, remediation becomes easier to justify. When it is presented as a generic security issue, prioritization varies across the group.

A Better Model for Group Security: Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) 

    CTEM is an operating approach that helps organizations reduce real external risk by focusing on exposures that are reachable and exploitable. Gartner states: “By 2026, organizations prioritizing their security investments based on a continuous threat exposure management program will be three times less likely to suffer from a breach.”

    CTEM is especially useful at group scale because it shifts remediation conversations away from vulnerability volume and toward validated priorities.

    What CTEM Must Deliver to Work at Group Scale 

      Proof of reachability - Groups need to know which issues attackers can actually reach from outside. This reduces noise and avoids spending time on findings that do not create real entry points.

      Clear attack paths - Remediation improves when teams can see how an exposure leads to meaningful impact. Showing how weaknesses connect across domains, portals, and remote access systems makes prioritization easier for application, infrastructure, and business owners.

      Business impact translation - Fixing decisions become faster when security findings are tied to business outcomes such as downtime risk, fraud exposure, compliance impact, or operational disruption.

      Together, these elements turn remediation requests into evidence-backed actions.

      How CyberMindr Supports a Proof-Based Operating Model 

        CyberMindr helps large enterprise apply CTEM across their group of companies by providing continuous visibility into internet-facing exposure and validating which risks are actionable.

        CyberMindr performs 17,500+ automated live checks using safe validation methods such as version-based checks and proof-of-concept logic to reduce false positives and confirm exploitability. This helps teams focus on the exposures that are most likely to be used in real attacks.

        CyberMindr also supports Attack Path Discovery, helping security leaders understand how external exposures connect to critical business systems. This is particularly valuable in group environments where ownership is distributed across subsidiaries and teams.

        To strengthen prioritization decisions, CyberMindr monitors 300+ hacker forums to identify vulnerabilities that are actively discussed and likely to be targeted. Combined with validation, this helps security teams act faster on exposures that matter most.

        Finally, the platform offers executive-friendly reporting and maps risks to frameworks such as ISO 27001 and NIST, enabling group security leaders to show progress as measurable reduction in exploitable exposure rather than only activity metrics. 

        Evidence Drives Consistent Remediation 

        Organizations with multiple subsidiaries do not need more dashboards showing added list of vulnerabilities. They need a clearer way to identify which exposures are reachable, exploitable, and urgent across business units.

        When proof is available, remediation becomes easier to coordinate. Application owners can prioritize fixes confidently, infrastructure teams can act with clear justification, and leadership can measure progress through reduced external exposure over time.

        A validation-driven CTEM approach creates consistency across the group. CyberMindr replaces generic escalations with evidence that teams can act on and track to completion

        Schedule a Demo

        Frequently Asked Questions

        When managing multiple subsidiaries, a vague request like “Please fix this” often fails because it lacks context. Subsidiary teams need clear evidence that the risk is real, urgent, and exploitable. Without proof, security issues compete with other business priorities, leading to delays. Evidence-based cybersecurity approaches, like CyberMindr, provide validated insights to help teams focus on actionable risks, ensuring faster and more consistent remediation across the organization.

        Common risks include internet-facing applications unintentionally exposed to the public, misconfigured cloud services, weak authentication on admin panels, leaked credentials, and abandoned domains. These vulnerabilities are well-understood but often repeat across subsidiaries because prioritization varies. By using tools like CyberMindr, organizations can identify and remediate these risks systematically, focusing on exposures that attackers can actually exploit.

        Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) shifts the focus from vulnerability volume to validated priorities. For group-scale cybersecurity, CTEM provides proof of reachability, clear attack paths, and translates risks into business impact. This evidence-based approach helps subsidiaries prioritize remediation efforts effectively. CyberMindr supports CTEM by automating live checks, identifying exploitable risks, and offering executive-friendly reporting, ensuring measurable progress in reducing external exposure.

        Prioritization is difficult because subsidiaries face different operational timelines, resource constraints, and business priorities. Vulnerability reports often overwhelm remediation capacity, and severity classifications alone don’t provide actionable insights. Evidence-based cybersecurity solutions like CyberMindr address this challenge by validating which risks are exploitable and urgent, enabling teams to focus on the most critical issues without getting bogged down by excessive reporting.

        CyberMindr enhances evidence-based cybersecurity by providing continuous visibility into internet-facing exposures and validating actionable risks. It performs over 17,500 automated live checks to confirm exploitability, reducing false positives. Additionally, CyberMindr monitors hacker forums for actively discussed vulnerabilities and supports Attack Path Discovery to show how exposures connect to critical systems. These features help subsidiaries prioritize fixes confidently and enable leadership to measure progress through reduced exploitable exposure.